Working Effectively With Biostatistics Analysis Center (BAC) Staff

This document provides some suggestions to facilitate communication between faculty investigators, biostatisticians and BAC staff with the goal of maintaining an efficient and collegial relationship.
  1. Communicate often, clearly, and with a plan
    • Projects run more smoothly when there is frequent, clear, and focused communication, which requires a strong commitment from faculty investigators, faculty biostatisticians, and BAC staff.
    • It is the BAC staff member's responsibility to update the investigator regarding the requested analysis, but intervals between communications may vary. You should ask for an update if you want to know something sooner.
    • Overall, if problems are perceived with individual BAC staff members, please first attempt to communicate directly with the staff member before contacting the BAC Managing Director (Amy Praestgaard).
  2. Clarify work expectations in advance
    • The faculty biostatistician is often best positioned to understand both investigator and BAC perspectives of task expectations, and is expected to work with the investigator in prioritizing analyses.
    • BAC staff vary in background. If your study requires particular skills, such as programming in R, SPSS or Stata, we will try to find a specific staff member to fulfill the particular need.
    • Not all analyses are created equal. The BAC staff and faculty biostatistician will try to keep the investigator apprised of the amount of work or time it will take to perform specific analyses, striving to communicate the implications of any analyses requested.
    • Because the BAC is supposed to be revenue neutral, when work exceeds the previously agreed scope of the project, some intervention may be needed.
  3. Work from an analysis plan or to-do list
    • The faculty investigator and biostatistician along with BAC staff need to work together with a specific analysis plan. This plan targets the work toward publication, and can be produced by any combination of the investigator, faculty statistician, and BAC staff member(s). All parties should retain a copy of the analysis plan regardless of who is responsible for its development. Sometimes a plan can be as simple as an email confirming the next steps in the analysis.
    • To help the analysis run more smoothly, the analysis plan should specifically describe all pertinent goals of the study. This will help the BAC statistician understand where the study or paper is headed.
    • All parties should leave any joint meeting with a clear idea of who is responsible for each action item arising from that meeting. We recommend circulating a written to-do list to all relevant members of the study group. However, a verbal summary at the end of a meeting is sufficient, as long as someone writes it down.
  4. Help provide adequate lead time
    • The BAC staff member (and, perhaps, the BAC Managing Director) should be informed as far in advance as possible of any deadlines requiring analysis due to abstracts, grant renewals, or DSMB or external advisory meetings.
    • Last-minute requests are difficult for everyone and cannot always be accommodated. For long-term projects with a number of investigators, it is a good idea to create a rough project-specific calendar in advance, with dates for grant deadlines, abstracts for papers, and the like.
Penn Medicine CCEB Home